Every new colour, every capsule, every sales channel needs its own photos. For many brands the catalogue grows faster than photo production: variants go live with a single flat shot, or wait weeks for the next shoot. Either way, the product page sells less than it could.
This guide looks at where AI-generated images make sense, where a traditional shoot is still the better choice and how to organise the workflow starting from the photos you already have.
A studio shoot works well for the key pieces of a collection: there is creative direction, a photographer, models, retouching. The problem starts when the same process has to cover everything else: colour variants, continuity items, marketplace images, vertical formats for social. Each variant means setting the machine up again, with fixed costs that stay high even for a handful of items.
Iconic pieces, main campaign images and everything that defines the brand's visual identity still deserve a carefully produced shoot. Many clients work this way: traditional shoots for the pieces that matter most, AI for variants and secondary content. It extends catalogue coverage without giving up control where it counts.
A generated image has to represent the product faithfully. Before a variant goes live, always check three things:
A beautiful but unfaithful photo just moves the problem from the product page to the returns warehouse.
The cleanest way is a comparison: pick a group of variants that only have a packshot today, add on-model images to half of them and compare conversion and returns between the two groups over the same period. That shows the effect on your catalogue, not a market average.
The full workflow is on the AI Studio page.
No, they work alongside them. Many brands keep traditional shoots for iconic pieces and the main campaign and use AI for colour variants and secondary content.
The packshots you already have: ghost or flat shots from your catalogue, which can be uploaded in bulk.
Every image is reviewed before publishing: colour and fabric are checked against the physical sample, along with details such as logos and seams and how plausible the fit looks.